Ironically, the results of mistakes often end up to be far more interesting than those of hard work. Marvin Gaye’s 1970 hit “What’s Going On” serves as one of those miraculous examples of serendipity. During the recording sessions a rather fortunate accident occurred. The singer had recorded two alternate takes of the lead-vocals that were one octave apart. When the artist asked the sound engineer on duty, Ken Sands, to play these two tracks for him, the technician unwittingly played them simultaneously in mono. The unintended result was a duet between the singer and himself
Tags
afrofuturism anne danielsen aphex twin aristotle artist asca author betty davis biography bootsy collins claude lévi-strauss conceptual personae contingency cornel west counterfuture cultural history cv data downbeat economy engineer epistemology ferdinand de saussure franz kafka frequency friedrich kittler friedrich nietzsche félix guattari george clinton gilles deleuze hannah arendt henri lefebvre hip-hop humanism humanities information intellectual invisible man iteration jacques derrida jacques ranciere james brown knowledge kodwo eshun life literary theory louis armstrong marshall mcluhan martin heidegger marvin gaye mathematics me media metaphysics michel de certeau michel foucault multi-track music nature noise nonsense ol' dirty bastard operations parody peter szendy philosophy place pluralism prince producer quoting ralph ellison revolution rhythm roland barthes RZA science senses serendipity sirens space technology theodor w. adorno the one tracks typology vilém flusser walter benjamin what's going on wu-tang clan
Blogroll
RSS Links
Meta
philosophy or your life
When one of his students dared to ask Martin Heidegger if he could tell him something about the life of Aristotle, Heidegger mockingly answered: ”Aristotle was born, he worked, he died.” This denial to acknowledge the relevance of biography for philosophy is ironic to say the least. There are hardly any philosophers whose works were as noticeably influenced by personal events as his own. Moreover, this rejection of biography is inconsistent with other aspects of his philosophy.