<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>medial operations &#187; michel foucault</title>
	<atom:link href="http://medialoperations.com/tag/michel-foucault/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://medialoperations.com</link>
	<description>research-without-progress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 09:56:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>about medial operations</title>
		<link>http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/13/about-medial-operations/</link>
		<comments>http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/13/about-medial-operations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 22:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yeehaa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[about]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jacques derrida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marshall mcluhan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michel foucault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medialoperations.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do media &#8211; old and new &#8211; shape and transform knowledge? The research-in-progress website, Medial Operations, focuses on the complex transitions between noise, non-sense, information, and knowledge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medial Operations is an ad hoc publication platform for <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="about-me">my</a> current research-project-in-progress. The three open-ended, interrelated questions that run through the different posts and other contributions on this website are:</p>
<blockquote id="question1"><p>#1 How do technological media produce, shape and transform knowledge?</p></blockquote>
<p>In this research project, I depart from an insight developed by (amongst others) the philosopher Walter Benjamin and the media theorist Marshall McLuhan: the technological a priori of art, culture, and – most importantly – (academic) knowledge are not secondary to their content. Media matter; they are not just the accidental and transitory shape of a necessary and eternal truth. Inside and outside, content and form, message and medium are inextricably linked. In fact, without some kind of (technological) apparatus of storage and transmission there would not be any content at all.</p>
<p>Since all technological media have a unique material structure, they produce, shape, and transform information in many different ways. What is data to a certain medium could therefore just as well be noise or nonsense to another. ‘Medial Operations’ is the concept that I would like introduce to designate the complex transitions between noise, nonsense, information, and knowledge. This research website questions the ontological and epistemological ramifications of such shifts between different media. Or, to avoid unnecessary abuse of philosophical jargon:</p>
<blockquote id="question2"><p>#2 What happens when data travels from one medium to another?</p></blockquote>
<p>Through medial operations the technology of a certain era often links up. Rather than functioning in isolation, media work with and against each other. Friedrich Kittler has baptized such historically determined sets of competing and cooperating media <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-1')" title="expand/collapse slider: writing&#32;systems.">writing systems.</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-1"></span> A writing system forms the technological a priori of an age. Each of these media-dependent epistèmes has its own singular set of operations to select and extract sections of noise and transform them into data.</p>
<p>Despite the plurality of writing systems, it would be a mistake to presume an unmediated outside. All data is inscribed in a medium. The only distinctions possible are those between different modes of storage, processing, and transmission. In other words, all that is left are different modes of medial expressions. Following one of Jacques Derrida’s suggestions, this research website does not make a distinction between original and mediated expressions, but aims to develop a <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-2')" title="expand/collapse slider: typology&#32;of&#32;iterations">typology of iterations</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-2"></span>… or, better yet, a <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-3')" title="expand/collapse slider: topography&#32;of&#32;operations.">topography of operations.</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-3"></span></p>
<p>The concept ‘medial operations’ is chosen to indicate the similarities and differences with Michel Foucault’s ‘discursive operations’. Just like discursive operations, medial operations precede positivities. They do not directly produce content, but determine the expressive modalities and limits of knowledge in a given epistème.</p>
<p>Following Kittler’s critique of Foucault, though, I believe that the a priori of an epistème do not primarily depend on discourse but on technology. Whether discursive or medial, though, the word ‘operation’ is used to erase the mechanistic connotations that such transitions may invoke and emphasize their productive dimension instead. Medial operations do not happen automatically; they are creative acts. This leads to the third and perhaps most important question:</p>
<blockquote id="question3"><p>#3 How can scholars capitalize on medial operations to develop new ways of knowing?</p></blockquote>
<p>Medial Operations tries to redefine the concepts of university, discipline, and <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-4')" title="expand/collapse slider: intellectual">intellectual</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-4"></span> in the age of digital media. How can academics use the possibilities of past, present, and future media to develop new ways of knowing, as well as alternative educational models? The acceptance of new media in the humanities, however, does not only depend on the availability and accessibility of the latest technology. Even more importantly, it demands an openness to change.</p>
<p>In order to grasp the institutional complexity of this last problem, media theory alone does not suffice; discourse analysis – in some shape or form – has to be brought back in. The study of the technological a priori of knowledge needs to be complemented with insights from poststructuralism, gender and race studies, and psychoanalysis. The discourse that needs to be critically analyzed, however, turns out to be our own. <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-5')" title="expand/collapse slider: //&#32;bibliography">// bibliography</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-5"></span></p>
<DIV id="hackadelic-sliderNote-1" class="concealed">I use the literal translation of the german concept ‘Aufschreibesysteme’ rather than the common English translation ‘Discourse Networks’ because I find the latter to be simultaneously too loose and too specific.</DIV><DIV id="hackadelic-sliderNote-2" class="concealed"><p>
<p>The critique of linguistic presence that Jacques Derrida develops in “Signature Event Context” (1971) has become a common place in contemporary philosophy and literary theory. Often forgotten, however – not in the last place by the French philosopher himself – is the fact that this essay does not just proclaim the ‘death of metaphysics’ but also sketches a path for future philosophical research. “Signature Event Context” initiates a shift from meaningful signs to the acts, procedures, and operations that invoke them.</p>
<p>In ”Signature Event Context”, Derrida unfolds the radical consequences of Ferdinand de Saussure’s argument that spacing – on a material level – is a precondition for any kind of linguistic structure:</p>
<blockquote><p>“This force of rupture is due to the spacing with constitutes the written sign: the spacing which separates it from other elements of the internal contextual chain (the always open possibility of its extraction and grafting), but also from all the forms of a present referent (past or to come in the modified form of the present or to come) that is objective or subjective. The spacing is not the simple negativity of a lack, but the emergence of the mark.” (Derrida 317)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As opposed to the aspirations of the Swiss linguist’s, “Signature Event Context” demonstrates that these constitutional gaps and breaches can never be bridged. Breaking with a context, any context, is both cause and effect of all writing and speaking. Since the emergence of these meaning-producing ruptures can impossibly be explained from the context with which they break, Derrida refers to them as events.</p>
<p>Due to these ruptures, statements and utterances cannot be used in an inappropriate manner. Or at least, there is no false use in respect to an original context or addressee. The intentions of an author, or the norms, values, and customs of a historical discourse, can never  – not even partially – determine the proper use of an utterance. A statement has to be iterable (repeatable, citable) in any possible context in order to be legible at all. </p>
<blockquote><p>“The possibility of repeating, and therefore identifying, marks is implied in every code, making of it a communicable, transmittable, decipherable grid that is iterable for a third party, and thus for any possible user in general” (315)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>According to Derrida, every linguistic system has to consists solely of quotable marks. A system of differences – spacing – is a precondition for this radical iterability. Even speaking is therefore a form of writing. The fact, however, that these potential citations neither have an original nor an ultimate meaning, does not imply that they are completely devoid of sense. On the contrary, each utterance or statement – more precisely, each instantiation of an utterance or a statement – by definition produces its own context. Its proper use and meaning coincide with an act of writing, and it is in that very broad sense that language is performative. </p>
<p>To a student of Friedrich Nietzsche like Jacques Derrida, this universalizing conclusion — every statement is iterable; language is always performative — would not make sense, if it were not immediately followed by a pluralizing gesture: there are different modes of iteration. It is exactly in pluralizing and specifying these broad, abstract categories that Derrida sees opportunities for future philosophical research. Towards the end of “Signature Event Context”, he states:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Thus, one must less oppose citation or iteration to the noniteration of the event, than construct a differential typology of forms of iteration, supposing that this is a tenable project that can give rise to an exhaustive program, a question I am holding off on here. In this typology, the category of intention will not disappear; it have its place, but from this place it will no longer be able to govern the entire scene and the entire system of utterances. Above all, one then would be concerned with different type of marks or chains of iterable marks, and not with an opposition between citational statements on the one hand, and singular and original statement-events on the other.” (326)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Rather than finding or constructing an origin, truth, presence, or consciousness, Derrida proposes to capitalize on the possibilities that emerge from the lack of such a foundation for knowledge. Hence, a typology of iterations. To cover this programmatic aspect of “Signature Event Context”, however, I find the terms iteration and citation an unfortunate choice. These two words suggest that Derrida’s argument is limited to linguistics, while it actually applies to all forms of writing. Each mark that emerges necessarily breaks with its context; every inscription is an event.</p>
<p>I would argue that Derrida’s usage of the terms iteration and citation in  “Signature Event Context” is strategic. He needs them to emphasize the impossibility of singularity in language; To show that every utterance is defined by it iterability. When Derrida calls for a typology of forms iterations, however, these concepts actually obscure rather than clarify his point. Derrida does not literally wants to classify different forms of citation, he wants to explore the heterogeneous acts that invoke events. There are many ways to break with a context. In order to emphasize this broader relevance of Derrida’s critique, I propose to replace the term iteration with (medial) operation.</p>
</p>
</DIV><DIV id="hackadelic-sliderNote-3" class="concealed"><p><object id="prezi_nmul68mdxe3p" name="prezi_nmul68mdxe3p" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="660" height="400"><param name="movie" value="http://prezi.com/bin/preziloader.swf"/><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"/><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"/><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff"/><param name="flashvars" value="prezi_id=nmul68mdxe3p&amp;lock_to_path=0&amp;color=ffffff&amp;autoplay=no"/><embed id="preziEmbed_nmul68mdxe3p" name="preziEmbed_nmul68mdxe3p" src="http://prezi.com/bin/preziloader.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="660" height="400" bgcolor="#ffffff" flashvars="prezi_id=nmul68mdxe3p&amp;lock_to_path=0&amp;color=ffffff&amp;autoplay=no"></embed></object><br />
</p></DIV><DIV id="hackadelic-sliderNote-4" class="concealed"><p>
<p>The ‘Intellectual Image’ conceives the image as a site where multiple so-called conceptual personae are confronted with each other. ‘Conceptual personae’ is a term introduced by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari to designate the immanent, intelligent agents that can be found in philosophical texts. In coining this term they implicitly respond to Roland Barthes’ death of the author and Michel Foucault’s claim that the the word ‘author’ refers to a “… complex variable of discourse …” Deleuze and Guattari, on the other hand, argue that the author – as an agent of discourse rather than a variable – is reborn inside the text, exactly at the empty space that his death left behind.
</p>
<p>The object of the research proposed here will be the figure of the intellectual. In his essay ‘The Dilemma of the Black Intellectual’(1984), Cornel West emphasizes the critical potential of his protagonist that stems from the fact that this situated individual is always caught between two discursive practices, that of the white society and the black community. These practices force conflicting roles – in other words personae – upon the black intellectual. As a result, this figure functions as an arena in which these discursive tensions intersect and clash. In other words, not the situated individual but the conceptual personae are the actual agents of discourse.
</p>
<p>According to this line of thinking, the fact that the intellectual is a site rather than a person implies that this concept can no longer be restricted to human beings. Differently put, a text, image, record or movie can also function as an intellectual in this new sense of the word. The situated individual has become a medium amongst others. In my research, I want to show that this so-called medial turn transforms the image from a representation to a collision point where heterogeneous conceptual personae and their corresponding discursive practices come together.
</p>
<p>This project resulted in two articles — <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="medialoperations.com/2009/05/16/new-adventures-in-low-fidelity/">New Adventures in Low-Fidelity</a> and <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="medialoperations.com/2009/05/12/oh-baby-i-like-it-raw-article/"> Oh Baby, I Like It Raw </a>– and several lectures.</p>
</DIV><DIV id="hackadelic-sliderNote-5" class="concealed"><p>
<li>Benjamin, Walter. “The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction.” Illuminations. Trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken, 1968. 217–51.</li>
<li>Derrida, Jacques. “Signature Event Context.” Margins of Philosophy. Trans. Alan Bass. Brighton: Harvester Press, 1982. 307–330.</li>
<li>Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books, 1972.</li>
<li>Kittler, Friedrich. Discourse Networks, 1800/1900. Trans. Michael Metteer &amp; Chris Cullens. Stanford University Press, 1992.</li>
<li>Kittler, Friedrich. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Trans. Winthrop-Young Geoffrey Winthrop-Young &amp; Michael Wutz. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.</li>
<li>McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Routledge, 2001.</li>
</DIV>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/13/about-medial-operations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>oh baby, i like it raw</title>
		<link>http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/03/oh-baby-i-like-it-raw-2/</link>
		<comments>http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/03/oh-baby-i-like-it-raw-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yeehaa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[lectures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claude lévi-strauss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friedrich nietzsche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gilles deleuze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hip-hop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michel foucault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ol' dirty bastard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[producer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RZA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wu-tang clan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medialoperations.com/?p=1131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A presentation that I gave on the 27th of October 2008 at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis for the Music and Sound Studies Initiative lecture series organized by Sumanth Gopinath.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/03/oh-baby-i-like-it-raw-2/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p><strong>‘Oh Baby, I Like it Raw // On Music Production and Knowledge Engineering’</strong></p>
<p>A presentation that I gave on the 27th of October 2008 at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis for the <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.ias.umn.edu/collabs08-09/MusicSound.php">Music and Sound Studies Initiative</a> lecture series organized by Sumanth Gopinath.</p>
<p>earlier (and shorter) versions of this lecture were presented:</p>
<li><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.perdu.nl/">Theater Perdu</a>, 7/12/2007 (in Dutch)  — tijdens de thema-avond ‘De Intellectueel in de 21e Eeuw’</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.janvaneyck.nl">Jan van Eyck</a>, 9/1/2008 — during Opening Week 2008</li>
<li>Universiteit Leiden 6/5/2008 (in Dutch) — tijdens het vakgroep colloquium literatuurwetenschap</li>
<p></p>
<p>I later made an article out of it, that was published in the volume <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.c-s-p.org/Flyers/Sonic-Mediations--Body--Sound--Technology1-84718-839-7.htm">Sonic Mediations: Body, Sound, Technology</a> by Carolyn Birdsall and Anthony Enns.</p>
<p>You can read it on this site:<br />
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="medialoperations.com/2009/06/03/oh-baby-i-like-it-raw/">Oh Baby, I Like It Raw: Engineering Truth </a> (password protected)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/03/oh-baby-i-like-it-raw-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>about intellectual image</title>
		<link>http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/01/about-intellectual-image/</link>
		<comments>http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/01/about-intellectual-image/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yeehaa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[about]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[félix guattari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gilles deleuze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michel foucault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roland barthes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medialoperations.com/?p=880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this research project, I conceive agency as an attribute of medial operations rather than of individuals. Certain combinations of operations produce an agent, which may or may not coincide with an actual person. Consequently, I argue that the term “intellectual” invokes an outdated practice. Not the intellectual is an endangered species, but his text-based and text-biased medial operations. As an alternative, I have looked at sound and music engineering as a practice of knowledge production. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ‘Intellectual Image’ conceives the image as a site where multiple so-called conceptual personae are confronted with each other. ‘Conceptual personae’ is a term introduced by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari to designate the immanent, intelligent agents that can be found in philosophical texts. In coining this term they implicitly respond to Roland Barthes’ death of the author and Michel Foucault’s claim that the the word ‘author’ refers to a “… complex variable of discourse …” Deleuze and Guattari, on the other hand, argue that the author – as an agent of discourse rather than a variable – is reborn inside the text, exactly at the empty space that his death left behind.
</p>
<p>The object of the research proposed here will be the figure of the intellectual. In his essay ‘The Dilemma of the Black Intellectual’(1984), Cornel West emphasizes the critical potential of his protagonist that stems from the fact that this situated individual is always caught between two discursive practices, that of the white society and the black community. These practices force conflicting roles – in other words personae – upon the black intellectual. As a result, this figure functions as an arena in which these discursive tensions intersect and clash. In other words, not the situated individual but the conceptual personae are the actual agents of discourse.
</p>
<p>According to this line of thinking, the fact that the intellectual is a site rather than a person implies that this concept can no longer be restricted to human beings. Differently put, a text, image, record or movie can also function as an intellectual in this new sense of the word. The situated individual has become a medium amongst others. In my research, I want to show that this so-called medial turn transforms the image from a representation to a collision point where heterogeneous conceptual personae and their corresponding discursive practices come together.
</p>
<p>This project resulted in two articles — <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="medialoperations.com/2009/05/16/new-adventures-in-low-fidelity/">New Adventures in Low-Fidelity</a> and <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="medialoperations.com/2009/05/12/oh-baby-i-like-it-raw-article/"> Oh Baby, I Like It Raw </a>– and several lectures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/01/about-intellectual-image/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>about time tracks</title>
		<link>http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/01/about-time-tracks/</link>
		<comments>http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/01/about-time-tracks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yeehaa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[about]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books // volumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[félix guattari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[franz kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gilles deleuze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jacques derrida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marshall mcluhan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marvin gaye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michel foucault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-track]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prince]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roland barthes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vilém flusser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walter benjamin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medialoperations.com/?p=882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The monograph <cite>Time Tracks</cite> constructs anachronistic and eclectic constellations of philosophical concepts, biographical narratives and popular music. It stages unexpected encounters between Gilles Deleuze, Prince, Walter Benjamin, Franz Kafka, Vilém Flusser, Marvin Gaye, Michel Foucault, Camille and Marshall McLuhan. What brings this wide range of philosophers, media theorists, authors, and artists together is a shared concern; they all struggle with time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The monograph <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-6')" title="expand/collapse slider: Time&#032;Tracks">Time Tracks</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-6"></span> constructs anachronistic and eclectic constellations of philosophical concepts, biographical narratives and popular music. It stages unexpected encounters between Gilles Deleuze, Prince, Walter Benjamin, Franz Kafka, Vilém Flusser, Marvin Gaye, Michel Foucault, Camille and Marshall McLuhan. What brings this wide range of philosophers, media theorists, authors, and artists together is a shared concern; they all struggle with time.</p>
<p>In their respective academic, artistic and everyday practices, all of these thinkers deploy creative acts to deal with problems of temporality. In their quest to unravel, master, respect or multiply the mysteries of time, they explore the interstices between arts, media and various academic disciplines. I will argue that these excursions have, either intentionally or accidentally, led to new ways of conceptualizing time. Case studies that I develop in this study range from Gilles Deleuze’s ‘time-image’ to grasp cinema’s unique mode of temporality to Marvin Gaye’s experiments with multi-track recording technology to recover lost times.</p>
<p>Inspired by these non-conventional approaches, <cite>Time Tracks</cite> exploits the potential of an <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-7')" title="expand/collapse slider: experimental&#032;layout">experimental layout</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-7"></span> to open up the philosophical problem of time. The book juxtaposes the main argument, set in the body of the page, with small, additional texts in the margins. This spatial separation enables conversations between arts, media, and disciplines. <cite>Time Tracks</cite> thereby both theoretically argues and visually shows that philosophical problems are not the prerogative of a certain academic practice but transgress the boundaries between theory, literature, music, and life.</p>
<h2>Synopsis</h2>
</p>
<p><cite>Time Tracks</cite> starts from the media-theoretical insight that philosophy persistently omits a crucial factor in its analyses, namely the material structure of the texts that it consumes and produces. This book compensates for this negligence by pointing out that the technical medium has – and has had – a decisive impact on its content. This argument applies to theories on time in particular. Since temporality is never experienced directly but always through a medium in the broadest sense of the word – ranging from the sun dial and the human body to the computer – this concept cannot possibly be studied separately from that of mediality. </p>
<p>If there is no time without a medium and vice versa, then the contemporary multi-medial landscape is inevitably also a multi-temporal one. Time Tracks proposes a temporal pluralism. Its central thesis holds that time should be conceived as a multiplicity. I introduce the concept of time track to designate the individual temporal manifestations that make up this multiplicity. I will argue that there is no single concept of time that is eternally and universally valid, but multiple time tracks that maintain a complex reciprocal relation to the medium in which they are expressed. Each medial expression is inextricably linked to a unique constellation of time tracks. Problems of temporality can therefore not be solved if one stays within the straitjacket of textuality; they demand an active exploration of the expressive modalities of different media.</p>
<p><cite>Time Tracks</cite> is a mediator of time as much as it is a meditation on time. The book both proposes and performs an experimental use of technical media in philosophy. In an attempt to erode the linearity of the text, theoretical, literary, musical, and biographical excursions appear in the margins of the page. The theoretical function of these side texts constantly shifts throughout the dissertation. Their function depends on the conceptual and medial context in which they appear. Sometimes, they support, complement or criticize the main argument. At others, they contain biographical anecdotes, fictional narratives  and other background stories. In all cases, however, the excursions in the margins interrupt the habitual attitude that the reader has developed towards books of philosophy. </p>
<DIV id="hackadelic-sliderNote-6" class="concealed"><p>[drain file 1 show]</p>
<p>The full title of this book-in-progress is: <cite>Time Tracks. Temporality in Philosophy, Media Theory and Popular Culture</cite>. The monograph will be the revised version of my PhD-thesis with which I graduated from the philosophy department of the University of Utrecht on December 12, 2005. <br />Registered users of this site can download a copy of the dissertation-version right here. If you would like to get a user-account, please contact me by leaving a comment.</p>
<p> </p></DIV><DIV id="hackadelic-sliderNote-7" class="concealed"><img src="http://medialoperations.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/time-tracks-finalpdf-page-73-of-211-11-372x256.jpg" alt="time-tracks-finalpdf-page-73-of-211-11" title="time-tracks-finalpdf-page-73-of-211-11" width="372" height="256" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1104" /></DIV>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/01/about-time-tracks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>about me</title>
		<link>http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/01/about-me/</link>
		<comments>http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/01/about-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yeehaa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[about]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[franz kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friedrich kittler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gilles deleuze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marvin gaye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michel foucault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prince]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ralph ellison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walter benjamin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medialoperations.com/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jan Hein Hoogstad is a lecturer in Comparative Literature and Cultural Analysis at the University of Amsterdam. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.medialoperations.com/files/2009/06/iphoto-185x185.jpg" alt="iphoto" title="iphoto" width="185" height="185" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2569" /> Jan Hein Hoogstad is assistant professor in <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.uva-literatuurwetenschap.nl">Comparative Literature and Cultural Analysis</a> at the University of Amsterdam. </p>
<p>In the fall of 2008, he was a visiting professor at the <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://english.umn.edu/">English Department</a> of the University of Minnesota. </p>
<p>In 2007 and 2008, Jan Hein was affiliated to the <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.janvaneyck.nl">Jan van Eyck Academy</a> in Maastricht as a postdoctoral researcher, where he worked on a project called <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="medialoperations.com/2009/06/01/about-intellectual-image/">Intellectual Image</a>. </p>
<p>Before, he wrote his dissertation <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="medialoperations.com/2009/06/01/about-time-tracks/">Time Tracks</a> at the department of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://phil.uu.nl">Philosophy</a> of the University of Utrecht, and <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="www.medienwissenschaft.hu-berlin.de">Media Theory</a> and <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.culture.hu-berlin.de/">Cultural Studies</a> at the Humboldt-University in Berlin. </p>
<p>[drain file 2 show]</p>
<p>Jan Hein has published on Prince, Marvin Gaye, Gilles Deleuze, Walter Benjamin, Franz Kafka, Friedrich Kittler, Ralph Ellison, Michel Foucault, and the Ol’ Dirty Bastard.</p>
<p> He is currently working on a research project called <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="medialoperations.com/2009/06/01/about/">Medial Operations</a> and a website with the same title, as well as co-editing a volume called <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="/about-pluralizing-rhythm">Pluralizing Rhythm.</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://medialoperations.com/2009/06/01/about-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>mapping session 1</title>
		<link>http://medialoperations.com/2009/05/13/mapping-session-1/</link>
		<comments>http://medialoperations.com/2009/05/13/mapping-session-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yeehaa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[courses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gilles deleuze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michel de certeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michel foucault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[place]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walter benjamin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medialoperations.com/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A prezi map made out of individual students projects for my course 'Space is the Place: Literature, Music and Spatiality'.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><code></code></p>
<p>A prezi map made out of individual students projects for my course ‘Space is the Place: Literature, Music and Spatiality’</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://medialoperations.com/2009/05/13/mapping-session-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

