<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>medial operations &#187; what&#8217;s going on</title>
	<atom:link href="http://medialoperations.com/tag/whats-going-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://medialoperations.com</link>
	<description>research-without-progress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 09:56:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>a rather fortunate accident</title>
		<link>http://medialoperations.com/2009/09/05/a-rather-fortunate-accident/</link>
		<comments>http://medialoperations.com/2009/09/05/a-rather-fortunate-accident/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yeehaa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[scribbles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contingency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marvin gaye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-track]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serendipity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what's going on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medialoperations.com/?p=2201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ironically, the results of mistakes often end up to be far more interesting than those of hard work. Marvin Gaye’s 1970 hit “What’s Going On” serves as one of those miraculous examples of serendipity. During the recording sessions a rather fortunate accident occurred. The singer had recorded two alternate takes of the lead-vocals that were one octave apart. When the artist asked the sound engineer on duty, Ken Sands, to play these two tracks for him, the technician unwittingly played them simultaneously in mono. The unintended result was a duet between the singer and himself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically, the results of mistakes often end up to be far more interesting than those of hard work. Marvin Gaye’s 1970 hit “What’s Going On” serves as one of those miraculous examples of serendipity. During the recording sessions a rather fortunate accident occurred. The singer had recorded two alternate takes of the lead-vocals that were one octave apart. When Gaye asked the sound engineer on duty, Ken Sands, to play these two tracks for him, the technician unwittingly played them simultaneously in mono. The unintended result was a duet between the singer and himself. </p>
<blockquote><p>“That double lead voice was a mistake on my part […] Marvin had cut two lead vocals, and wanted me to prepare a tape with the rhythm track up the middle and each of his vocals on separate tracks so he could compare them. Once I played that two-track mix on a mono machine and he heard both voices at the same time by accident.” (Sands qtd. in Edmonds 2001: 121–122)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Gaye liked this side-effect to such an extent that he not only decided to keep it, but pushed it to the extremes on his next album also titled <em>What’s Going On</em>. No longer content with the mere duplication of the single version, the artist multiplied his voice several times on the final mix of title track and the other songs on the <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-1')" title="expand/collapse slider: album.">album.</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-1"></span> After the release of <em>What’s Going On</em>, these harmonic, multilayered vocals quickly became Marvin Gaye’s hallmark style.</p>
<p>Although the singer and the engineer never planned to record them as such, the strange duet did not fall from the sky either. I would argue that the occurrence of the singer’s and engineer’s fortunate accident was due to an excess rather than a lack of talent. This mistake builds on Gaye and Sand’s respective expertise and skill sets. To use philosophical jargon: their fortunate accident was not random, it was <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-2')" title="expand/collapse slider: contingent">contingent</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-2"></span>.</p>
<p>Marvin Gaye – who produced the album himself – and his team of musicians and <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-3')" title="expand/collapse slider: engineers">engineers</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-3"></span> were engaged in many experiments with the sound recording technology available to them. They wanted to record an album that sound different from anything else on the market at the time. One of the biggest challenges that they faced was a way to make <em>What’s Going On</em> sound like one cohesive unit rather than a collection of songs. Gaye wanted to eliminate the cuts between the individual tracks so that the album <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-4')" title="expand/collapse slider: flowed&#32;continuously.">flowed continuously.</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-4"></span>While conductor and arranger David van dePitte suggested the use of so-called segues to connect the individual songs, the sound engineers came up with a different solution:</p>
<blockquote><p>“The studio technology was still pretty primitive […] To edit, you had to physically cut the tape with a blade. So when the basic rhythm tracks were done, Ken Sands and Cal Harris took the multi-tracks and edited the entire album together by hand. It was quite an accomplishment.” (Smith qtd. in Edmonds 2001: 167–168)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>After they cut and pasted the entire album together, Sands and Harris overdubbed the strings and horns directly onto the master mix.</p>
<p>There is no causal relation between the engineers’ experiments and the accident that occurred during the “What’s Going On” sessions Nonetheless, I believe such innovations testify to an openness that is needed to recognize such fortunate contingencies when they occur. In a more traditional recording session, the creative potential of the same event would probably have been dismissed or even gone unnoticed.</p>
<p>Marvin Gaye’s extraordinary vocal talents were also essential to the occurrence of this particular accident. A lesser singer simply would not have pulled it off. Gaye originally intended to have The Originals – a male vocal group that he occasionally wrote and produced for – to record “What’s Going On”. Like many other Motown acts, such as The Temptations and The Four Tops, the members of The Originals all covered a different range in the spectrum. Gaye’s own voice, however, could cover the entire range. By multilayering his voice, multitrack recording rendered other singers obsolete. Gaye did not need anyone else to record complex harmonies any longer. Through the doubling, tripling and sometimes even quadrupling of his voice, multi-track recording made it possible for the artist to sing the different voices on <em>What’s Going</em> all by himself.</p>
<blockquote><p>“His multitracked voices were startling. He’d become a one-man Moonglows, a one-man Originals, singing duets and trios with himself, juxtaposing his silky falsetto and sandpapery midrange, weaving the fabric of his voices into a tapestry of contrasting shapes and colors.” (Ritz 149)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Apart from the skills and talents of everyone involved, “What’s Going On”’s duet between Gaye and himself also presupposes the multitrack technology – an eight-track recorder to be precise – itself. It might sound obvious, but it is crucial to acknowledge that Sands and Gaye would have never stumbled upon it on a typewriter, or even a single tape deck. The mistake now known as <em>What’s Going On</em> is part of a complex constellation that consists of the artist, musicians, engineers, and technology.</p>
<DIV id="hackadelic-sliderNote-1" class="concealed"> An earlier mix of the album (the so-called Detroid mix, first released on the 2001 deluxe edition of <em>What’s Going On</em>) uses voice duplication on the entire album. Gaye, however, pulled this mix back last minute. The final (Los Angeles) mix of the album replaces these duets with polyphonic harmonies throughout.</DIV><DIV id="hackadelic-sliderNote-2" class="concealed"><p>Friedrich Nietzsche’s description of inspiration in <cite>Ecce Homo</cite> might help to understand this notion of contingency better:</p>
<blockquote><p> “Has anyone at the end of the nineteenth century a clear idea of what poets of strong ages have called inspiration? If not, I will describe it.— If one had the slightest residue of superstition left in one’s system, one could hardly reject altogether the idea that one is merely incarnation, merely mouthpiece, merely a medium of overpowering forces. The concept of revelation, in the sense that suddenly, with indescribable certainty and subtlety, something becomes visible, audible, something that shakes one to the last depths and throws one down, that merely describes the facts. One hears, one does not seek; one accepts, one does not ask who gives; like lightning, a thought flashes up, with necessity, without hesitation regarding its form,—I never had any choice. A rapture whose tremendous tension occasionally discharges itself in a flood of tears, now the pace quickens involuntarily, now it becomes slow; one is altogether beside oneself, with the distinct consciousness of subtle shudders and of one’s skin creeping down to one’s toes; a depth of happiness in which even what is most painful and gloomy does not seem something opposite but rather conditioned, provoked, a necessary color in such a superabundance of light; an instinct for rhythmic relationships that arches over wide spaces of forms—length, the need for a rhythm with wide arches, is almost the measure of the force of inspiration, a kind of compensation for its pressure and tension … Everything happens involuntarily in the highest degree but as in a gale of a feeling of freedom, of absoluteness, of power, of divinity … The involuntariness of image and metaphor is strangest of all; one no longer has any notion of what is an image or a metaphor, everything offers itself as the nearest, most obvious, simplest expression. It actually seems, to allude to something Zarathustra says, as if the things themselves approached and offered themselves as metaphors (—“Here all things come caressingly to your discourse and flatter you: for they want to ride on your back. On every metaphor you ride to every truth. Here the words and word-shrines of all being open up before you; here all being wishes to become word, all becoming wishes to learn from you how to speak—”). This is my experience of inspiration; I do not doubt that one has to go back thousands of years in order to find anyone who could say to me, “it is mine as well.” (512)</p>
</blockquote>
</DIV><DIV id="hackadelic-sliderNote-3" class="concealed">According to the credits of the 2001 deluxe edition of the album (the original release did not credit any engineers!) Ken Sands, Cal Harris, Bob Olhsson, Joe Attkinson, James Green, Sam Ross, Art Stewart, Steve Smith, and Larry Miles all worked on the album.</DIV><DIV id="hackadelic-sliderNote-4" class="concealed">The first, and probably also the most famous, example of the same effect is The Beatles’ <em>Sgt. Pepper Lonely Hearts Club Band</em> (1967) produced by George Martin.</DIV>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://medialoperations.com/2009/09/05/a-rather-fortunate-accident/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

