Category Archives: scribbles

pluralizing the future

Written by . Filed under drafts, scribbles. Tagged , , . No comments.
Mothership 2

In “Fur­ther Con­sid­er­a­tions on Afro­fu­tur­ism” (2003), Kodwo Eshun intro­duces the con­cept of ‘coun­ter­future’. He argues that this con­cept is a nec­es­sary, yet lack­ing coun­ter­part to that of ‘coun­ter­mem­ory’. The prac­tice of coun­ter­mem­ory aims to com­pen­sate for past vio­lence and destruc­tion by writ­ing the sto­ries of (oppressed) … Read More

philosophy or your life

Written by . Filed under scribbles. Tagged , , , , , , . No comments.
heidegger-2

When one of his stu­dents dared to ask Mar­tin Hei­deg­ger if he could tell him some­thing about the life of Aris­to­tle, Hei­deg­ger mock­ingly answered: ”Aris­to­tle was born, he worked, he died.” This denial to acknowl­edge the rel­e­vance of biog­ra­phy for phi­los­o­phy is ironic to say the least. There are hardly any philoso­phers whose works were as notice­ably influ­enced by per­sonal events as his own. More­over, this rejec­tion of biog­ra­phy is incon­sis­tent with other aspects of his philosophy.

a rather fortunate accident

Written by . Filed under scribbles. Tagged , , , , , , , , . No comments.
Gaye

Iron­i­cally, the results of mis­takes often end up to be far more inter­est­ing than those of hard work. Mar­vin Gaye’s 1970 hit “What’s Going On” serves as one of those mirac­u­lous exam­ples of serendip­ity. Dur­ing the record­ing ses­sions a rather for­tu­nate acci­dent occurred. The singer had recorded two alter­nate takes of the lead-​vocals that were one octave apart. When the artist asked the sound engi­neer on duty, Ken Sands, to play these two tracks for him, the tech­ni­cian unwit­tingly played them simul­ta­ne­ously in mono. The unin­tended result was a duet between the singer and himself

a typology of iterations

Written by . Filed under scribbles. Tagged , , , , , , . No comments.
quotes-185x185

The cri­tique of lin­guis­tic pres­ence that Jacques Der­rida devel­ops in “Sig­na­ture Event Con­text” (1971) has become a com­mon place in con­tem­po­rary phi­los­o­phy and lit­er­ary the­ory. Often for­got­ten, how­ever – and not in the last place by the French philoso­pher him­self – is the fact that this essay does not just pro­claim the ‘death of meta­physics’ but also sug­gests a path for future philo­soph­i­cal research. “Sig­na­ture Event Con­text” ini­ti­ates a shift from signs and mean­ing them­selves to the acts, pro­ce­dures, and oper­a­tions that invoke them.